Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Converging Pathways of Pain Research at NIDCR

Introduction

Pain - Beginnings of Pain Research at NIDCR
  - and the Dentist
  - Pain Ron Dubner and the "Lone Rangers"
Pain - A New Multi-Disciplinary Unit
Pain - Behavioral & Neural Responses to Pain
  - The Monkey's Informed Choices
  - Findings from the Behaving Monkey Studies
Pain - Testing Old and New Drugs for Pain
  - Differential Measurement of Pain Perception
  - Testing Old and New Drugs for Pain
Pain - A Laboratory Model For Clinical Pain
Pain - The Biochemistry & Genetics of Pain
  - Mapping the Spinal Cord
  - The Dynorphin Connection
  - Future Directions
Pain - Epilogue
Pain - Exhibit Index

...

Pain is a universally known and feared human condition, yet surely it is one of the least understood. Within this century it has been a philosophic problem, an enigma of neurophysiology, a psychological puzzle, a challenge to anesthesiologists, oncologists, nurses, clinicians of all kinds; and much of what we now think we know about pain still seems contradictory and paradoxical.

Painting

Here is another puzzle: how did the most versatile and productive pain research unit at NIH establish itself in the National Institute of Dental Research?

Pain and the Dentist

Div
classusa-grid
Div
classusa-width-two-thirds
The story begins in the late 1950s in the dentist's office. The mass screenings of the World Wars had revealed the failure of many Americans to seek regular dental care and the disastrous consequences that followed. The American Dental Association, the National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR; renamed the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) in 1999), and other authorities actively promoted regular dental visits, especially for children. But increased numbers of visits only pointed to the underlying problem: many Americans associated dentistry with pain and faced each appointment with dread.
Div
classusa-width-one-third

  Photograph of Edward DriscollEdward Driscoll

Div
classusa-grid
Div
classusa-width-two-thirds

Seeking to alleviate patient fears, dentists offered general anesthesia for many routine procedures.

It is estimated," NIDR researcher Edward Driscoll wrote in 1960, "that in many parts of the country...there are nearly as many general anesthetics administered in dental offices as there are in the local hospitals."

  • –NIDR Annual Report, 1960

But this well-meant practice drew fire from anesthesiologists and health authorities, on several grounds. Dentists, even oral surgeons, rarely had formal training in anesthesiology or experience with many of the new agents introduced in the 1950s and 1960s. Even if they had, it was often impossible for one person both to perform the operative procedure and to monitor the patient's physiological status. The difficulty of monitoring was further complicated by the lack of information about the side effects of such new agents as sodium pentothal and sodium methohexital -- a particularly dangerous ignorance in light of the fact that patients generally left the dentist's office within an hour after the procedure. For all these reasons, dental anesthesia was condemned as unsafe, although there were few documented cases of patient injury.

Div
classusa-width-one-third

A graph illustrating a cycle of fear and pain. Clinical pain leads to a painfuldental therapy, followed by postoperative pain and apprehension to avoidance of dental care, which leads to dental pathology and clinical pain
Cycle of Fear and Pain. From Raymond A. Dionne, Pain Control in Dentistry: The Basis for Rational Therapy. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry v. 6 (1985): 16.

Problems with general anesthesia in dentistry, 1960

  • Lack of training and experience
  • Lack of staff
  • Lack of data about agents used

...

The results of Driscoll's studies in the late 1950s and early 1960s provided the first data on the efficacy and risks of dental anesthesia; unfortunately, much of the data were never written up for publication and the records were finally lost to the need for space when the Pain Branch expanded in the 1970s.

Ron Dubner and the "Lone Rangers"

In 1964, Ronald Dubner returned to NIH from the University of Michigan. Dubner had worked in the Clinical Center from 1958 to 1961 as a young Dental Officer in the Commissioned Corps; there he had discovered his interest and talent for research, and successfully applied for NIH support for his Michigan doctoral studies in neurophysiology. Seymour Kreshover , Scientific Director of the Institute, was a major supporter of the young researcher and his plans to establish a basic neuroscience laboratory at NIDR.

...

Seymour Kreshover

Photograph of Patrick Wall and Ronald Melzack
Patrick Wall [l] and Ronald Melzack [r]

Photograph of Ron Dubner, Barry Sessle, and Eigld Moller
Ron Dubner [l] and Barry Sessle [r] with colleague Eigild Moller at International Association for Dental Research, mid-1970s

A New Multi-Disciplinary Unit

At this point, Dubner decided that he needed to "pick the brain" of a leader in the field and arranged a year's sabbatical at University College London with Patrick Wall (1970-71). He returned from London to an expanded and growing Section. Rhyuji Sumino had arrived from Japan to begin several years of collaborative work; he would soon be joined by Donald Price and Jimmy Hu . NIDR was reorganizing both its intramural and its extramural programs; as part of this initiative, Ed Driscoll played a key role on the Institute's Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on Pain Control (1971-72).

...

John Bonica at the podium.


The Monkey's Informed Choices

The awake behaving monkey experiments were among the most important undertaken by the Neurobiology and Anesthesiology Branch at NIDR in the 1970s and 1980s. These were real time observations of the ways in which an animal processed, reacted to, and acted on complex environmental information, including a noxious stimulus (a contact thermode placed near the lip), while microelectrode recordings were taken of the neuronal activity in the trigeminal brainstem. Originally designed by Ron Dubner and Ralph Beitel, the behavioral studies continued through several generations of postdocs and lab workers, including Catherine Bushnell, Gary Duncan, Ron Hayes, Donna Hoffman, Daniel Kenshalo, William Maixner, and Jean-Marie Oliveras .

...

An illustrationof a monkey performing tasks. The drawing identifies the thermode, the readylight; button, and the visual cue.
An illustration of a monkey performing tasks. The drawing identifies the thermode, the ready light & button, and the visual cue

The Monkey's Informed Choices

The awake behaving monkey experiments were among the most important undertaken by the Neurobiology and Anesthesiology Branch at NIDR in the 1970s and 1980s. These were real time observations of the ways in which an animal processed, reacted to, and acted on complex environmental information, including a noxious stimulus (a contact thermode placed near the lip), while microelectrode recordings were taken of the neuronal activity in the trigeminal brainstem. Originally designed by Ron Dubner and Ralph Beitel, the behavioral studies continued through several generations of postdocs and lab workers, including Catherine Bushnell, Gary Duncan, Ron Hayes, Donna Hoffman, Daniel Kenshalo, William Maixner, and Jean-Marie Oliveras .

...

Ronald Dubner, 1970s Photograph courtesy of NIDCR Public Information Office

Apparatus built by Fred Brown to administer thermal stimuli and record nerve impulses.
Apparatus built by Fred Brown to administer thermal stimuli and record nerve impulses

References

1 The National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) was renamed the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) on October 21, 1998.

...